ABSTRACT
La cirugía ortopédica ha avanzado mucho en estos años y, con ello, el uso de la intensificación de imágenes en el quirófano. El objetivo de este informe es revisar los principios biológicos de la radiación, el marco legal actual y hacer una breve reseña sobre la situación actual en la Argentina.
Orthopedic surgery has significantly advanced in the past years along with image intensifier fluoroscopy in the operating room. The purpose of this report is to review biological principles of radiation, as well as the current legal framework and to outline the present situation in Argentina.
Subject(s)
Humans , Argentina , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Exposure/standards , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Orthopedic Surgeons , Occupational DiseasesABSTRACT
Abstract Background: Data on the current situation of nuclear medicine practices in cardiology in Brazil are scarce. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has recommended eight "good practices" to minimize patients' ionizing radiation exposure during myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS). Objectives: To assess the adoption of the eight good practices in MPS in Brazil. Methods: Cross-sectional study with data obtained by use of a questionnaire. All hypothesis tests performed considered a significance level of 5%. Results: We observed that 100% of the nuclear medicine services (NMS) assessed do not use thallium-201 as the preferred protocol. Regarding the use of technetium-99m, 57% of the NMS administer activities above the threshold recommended by the IAEA (36 mCi) or achieve an effective dose greater than 15 millisievert (mSv). The abbreviated stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging is not employed by 94% of the NMS; thus, only 19% count on strategies to reduce the radioactive doses. Approximately 52% of the NMS reported always performing dose adjustment for patient's weight, while 35% administer poorly calculated doses in the one-day protocol. Conclusion: A considerable number of NMS in Brazil have not adopted at least six practices recommended by the IAEA. Despite the difficulties found in nuclear practice in some Brazilian regions, almost all obstacles observed can be overcome with no cost increase, emphasizing the importance of developing strategies for adopting "good practices" when performing MPS.
Resumo Fundamento: A situação atual das práticas da medicina nuclear em cardiologia no Brasil ainda é pouco conhecida. A Agência Internacional de Energia Atômica (AIEA) recomendou oito "boas práticas" para minimizar a exposição dos pacientes à radiação ionizante durante a Cintilografia de Perfusão Miocárdica (CPM). Objetivo: Analisar a adoção das oito boas práticas na CPM no Brasil. Métodos: Estudo transversal com dados obtidos através de questionário. Todos os testes de hipóteses desenvolvidos consideraram uma significância de 5%. Resultados: Observamos que 100% dos Serviços de Medicina Nuclear (SMN) não utilizam Tálio-201 como protocolo preferencial. Sobre a utilização do Tecnécio-99m, notamos que 57% administram atividades acima do limiar recomendado pela AIEA (36 mCi) ou resultam em uma dose efetiva maior que 15 milisievert (mSv). A fase única de estresse não é praticada por 94% dos SMN; portanto, somente 19% contam com estratégias de redução das doses radioativas. Cerca de 52% dos SMN afirmam que sempre realizam o ajuste da dose por peso e 35% administram doses mal calculadas no protocolo de um dia. Conclusão: Observamos que um número considerável de SMN no Brasil ainda não seguem seis ou mais das práticas recomendadas pela AIEA. Apesar das dificuldades enfrentadas na prática nuclear em algumas regiões do Brasil, quase todos os déficits observados podem ser resolvidos sem aumento de custos, ressaltando a importância do desenvolvimento de estratégias para aderência às "boas práticas" na realização da CPM.
Subject(s)
Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Myocardial Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Exposure/standards , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/standards , Nuclear Medicine/standards , Brazil , Cardiology/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methodsABSTRACT
Nuclear medicine is a rapidly growing discipline that employs advanced novel hybrid techniques that provide unique anatomical and functional information, as well as targets for molecular therapy. Concomitantly, there has been an increase in the attention paid to medical radiation exposure. A radiological justification for the practice of nuclear medicine has been implemented mainly through referral guidelines based on research results such as prospective randomized clinical trials. The International Commission on Radiological Protection recommends diagnostic reference levels as a practical mechanism to optimize medical radiation exposure in order to be commensurate with the medical purpose. The Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine has been implementing radiological optimization through a survey of the protocols on how each hospital determines the dose of administration of each radiopharmaceutical. In the case of nuclear medicine, radiation exposure of caregivers and comforters of patients discharged after administration of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals can occur; therefore, optimization has been implemented through written instructions for patients, based on international recommendations. The development of patient-radiation-dose monitoring software, and a national registry and management system of patient-radiation-dose is needed to implement radiological optimization through diagnostic reference levels. This management system must work in agreement with the "Institute for Quality Management of Nuclear Medicine", and must take into account the medical reality of Korea, such as low medicine fee, in order to implement reasonable radiological justification and optimization.